...mouse sperm protein, a disintegrin and metalloprotease...

来自 : 发布时间：2024-11-05

Investigation of the expression and functional significance of the novel mouse sperm protein, a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 motifs number 10 (ADAMTS10) - Dun - 2012 - International Journal of Andrology - Wiley Online LibraryInternational Journal of AndrologyVolume 35, Issue 4 p. 572-589 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Free Access Investigation of the expression and functional significance of the novel mouse sperm protein, a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 motifs number 10 (ADAMTS10) M. D. Dun, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia ARC Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology and Development, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorA. L. Anderson, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorE. G. Bromfield, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorK. L. Asquith, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorB. Emmett, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorE. A. McLaughlin, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia ARC Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology and Development, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorR. J. Aitken, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia ARC Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology and Development, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorB. Nixon, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author M. D. Dun, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia ARC Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology and Development, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorA. L. Anderson, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorE. G. Bromfield, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorK. L. Asquith, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorB. Emmett, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorE. A. McLaughlin, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia ARC Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology and Development, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorR. J. Aitken, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia ARC Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology and Development, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorB. Nixon, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author ADAMTS10 is a novel mouse sperm protein with a potential role in the mediation of sperm–oocyte interactions Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URLShare a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Abstract Fertilization represents the culmination of a series of complex interactions between male and female gametes. Despite advances in our understanding, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying these fundamental interactions remain largely uncharacterized. There is however growing recognition that this process requires the concerted action of multiple sperm receptors that possess affinity for complementary zona pellucida ligands and those that reside on the surface of the oolemma. Among the candidate sperm proteins that have been implicated in fertilization, those belonging to the ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloprotease) family of proteases have received considerable attention. The focus of the studies described herein has been the characterization of a closely related member of this protease family, ADAMTS10 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 motifs number 10). We have demonstrated that ADAMTS10 is expressed during the later stages of mouse spermatogenesis and incorporated into the acrosomal domain of developing spermatids. During sperm maturation, the protein appears to be processed before being expressed on the surface of the peri-acrosomal region of the head. Our collective data suggest that, from this position, ADAMTS10 participates in sperm adhesion to the zona pellucida. Indeed, pre-incubation of capacitated spermatozoa with either galardin, a broad spectrum inhibitor of metalloprotease activity, or anti-ADAMTS10 antisera elicited a significant reduction in their ability to engage in zona adhesion. Overall, these studies support the notion that sperm–oocyte interactions involve considerable functional redundancy and identify ADAMTS10 as a novel candidate in the mediation of these fundamentally important events. Introduction Mammalian fertilization is a highly complex process, the molecular basis of which has proven extremely difficult to resolve. Despite decades of research, the paucity of our knowledge in this field continues to overshadow attempts to resolve the aetiology of defective sperm function observed in a significant proportion of infertile males and to progress the development of novel, male-oriented methods for fertility regulation (McLaughlin & Aitken, 2011). This problem stems in part from widely accepted models that depict sperm–oocyte recognition as being attributed to a single receptor–ligand interaction. Notwithstanding the appeal of this simple lock and key mechanism, it fails to account for both the myriad of putative receptors and their complementary ligands that have been identified to date and mounting evidence that gamete adhesion can be resolved into multiple interactions of both low and high affinity (Thaler & Cardullo, 1996, 2002; Dun etal., 2010). Against this background, it has been argued that the sperm receptor may in fact be a composite structure containing multiple recognition molecules (Nixon etal., 2005, 2007; van Gestel etal., 2007; Tanphaichitr etal., 2007; Gadella, 2008; Gadella etal., 2008). Among the challenges posed by this new model are the mechanisms by which the activity of such a large cohort of proteins is coordinated to ensure both productive interaction with the egg and integration with downstream cell signalling events. An intriguing possibility is that specialized membrane microdomains, or rafts, may serve as platforms to sequester and/or mediate the assembly of multimeric zona receptor complexes on the outer leaflet of the sperm surface during the later stages of sperm maturation (van Gestel etal., 2005; Bou Khalil etal., 2006; Tanphaichitr etal., 2007; Boerke etal., 2008; Gadella etal., 2008; Nixon etal., 2009, 2011). Taking advantage of unprecedented technological developments in high-throughput mass spectrometry and enhanced methods for protein pre-fractionation, we have begun to explore the proteomic profile of sperm membrane rafts. Such studies have generated extensive protein inventories, revealing the anticipated presence of a number of proteins that have been implicated in sperm–zona pellucida binding, in addition to those involved in downstream interaction with the oolemma (Nixon etal., 2009, 2011). In addition, they have identified a number of previously unknown and/or uncharacterized sperm proteins and provided the impetus for defining which specific elements of the raft proteome are of functional significance to the fertilizing spermatozoon. With this goal in mind, we have focused on the characterization of one such novel protein, the metalloprotease ADAMTS10 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 motifs number 10). The rationale for targeting such a protein stems in part from pilot studies in which ADAMTS10 was identified as a putative client protein of heat-shock protein 1 (HSPD1, formerly HSP60; Nixon, unpublished), a molecular chaperone protein implicated in assembly of multimeric sperm receptor complexes (Asquith etal., 2004, 2005). Furthermore, ADAMTS10 shares a similar modular architecture (Somerville etal., 2004) and a high degree of sequence identity to the ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloprotease) family of metalloproteases that are known to mediate diverse cell and extracellular matrix adhesion events across a variety of cell types (Primakoff & Myles, 2000; van Goor etal., 2009). A gamut of ADAM family proteins are expressed in the male reproductive tract, many of which represent isoforms unique to the male germ line (Evans, 2001). Perhaps the best characterized of these are fertilin α (ADAM1b) and β (ADAM2), a sperm membrane heterodimer originally implicated in sperm–oolemmal binding and fusion (Primakoff etal., 1987; Wolfsberg etal., 1995). Several lines of evidence suggest that fertilin binds to integrin(s) on the oocyte plasma membrane and it has been suggested that a short hydrophobic amino acid sequence reminiscent of viral fusion proteins is responsible for its proposed role in sperm–oocyte fusion (Blobel etal., 1992; Almeida etal., 1995). However, knockout studies failed to confirm these assertions in an in vivo system (Cho etal., 1998). Somewhat surprisingly, the spermatozoa from ADAM2 null mice showed only modest reductions in their ability to engage in oolemmal binding and fusion but a far more prominent defect in their ability to bind to the zona pellucida and navigate through the uterotubal junction (Cho etal., 1998). A similar phenotype has also been documented following targeted deletion of other sperm ADAMs (ADAM1a and ADAM3) (Shamsadin etal., 1999; Nishimura etal., 2004), in addition to the testis-specific molecular chaperones, calmegin and calsperin (Ikawa etal., 2001, 2010), which appear necessary for ADAM protein assembly and/or presentation on the sperm surface. These data highlight a fascinating causal link between ADAM protein expression and fertilization (Ikawa etal., 2011). It is therefore of considerable interest to determine whether the closely related family of ADAMTS proteins are also critical determinants of sperm function. Unless otherwise specified, chemical reagents were obtained from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA) and were of molecular or research grade. Polyclonal antibodies raised against a synthetic peptide based on the catalytic domain of ADAMTS10 were purchased from Abcam (catalogue # ab59813; Cambridge, MA, USA). Monoclonal anti-CD59 (cat. # MCA1927) and polyclonal anti-HSPD1 (cat. # sc1052) antibodies were purchased from AbD Serotec (Raleigh, NC, USA) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), respectively. Alexa Fluor 555-labelled cholera toxin B subunit (CTB-AF555), Alexa Fluor 594-labelled Arachis hypogaea lectin (PNA), appropriate Alexa Fluor 488 (green) and 594 (red) conjugated secondary antibodies, and SYTOX green were all obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY, USA). Total RNA was isolated from adult mouse testes using Trizol (Invitrogen) and reverse-transcribed with reverse transcriptase III (Invitrogen). Adamts10 cDNA incorporating the metalloprotease, disintegrin, cysteine-rich and spacer domains (amino acids 257–886, Fig.S1) was amplified using Taq polymerase with proofreading activity (Advantage 2 PCR Enzyme System; BD Biosciences, Sparks, MD, USA) with synthetic oligonucleotide primers (forward: 5′-CGGAGAGATGTGGAGCAGTATGT-3′; reverse: 5′-TGGTGGACATGGTTCTGTGTTGC-3′) using standard procedures to generate an expected product size of 1890 bp. Amplified PCR products were gel-purified and sequenced using standard methods. They were then ligated into the pENTR/D-TOPO (Invitrogen) cloning vector and used to transform chemically competent Escherichia coli (OneShot TOP10; Invitrogen). Bacterial colonies containing the desired insert were identified by colony PCR screening and amplified by overnight culture in LB media containing 100 μg/mL kanamycin. Recombinant plasmid DNA was isolated from overnight cultures (FastPlasmid Mini kit; Eppendorf, Hauppauge, NY, USA) and used to perform an LR recombination reaction to generate an expression clone in the pDEST17 vector (Invitrogen). This vector is designed to produce recombinant protein in a bacterial expression system with an N-terminal 6× His tag. Recombinant expression vectors were subsequently transformed into DH5α competent E. coli cells and clones containing the correct insert identified as above. Purified DNA from the expression clones was finally transformed into BL21-AI chemically competent E. coli (Invitrogen) for recombinant protein expression. Overexpression of the recombinant ADAMTS10 protein was induced by growth of the BL21-AI cells in the presence of 2% arabinose. Bacterial lysates containing such proteins were affinity-purified on a nickel resin column (Ni-NTA Superflow; Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and fractions containing recombinant protein were identified on SDS–polyacrylamide gels. Excised bands corresponding to the purified ADAMTS10 protein were then used to immunize a rabbit for the production of polyclonal antisera. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) from the resulting antisera was affinity-purified using immobilized protein G (Protein G Dynabeads; Invitrogen) and specific ADAMTS10 antibodies were affinity-purified against the recombinant ADAMTS10 immunogen. All experimental procedures were carried out with the approval of the University of Newcastle’s Animal Care and Ethics Committee (ACEC). Inbred Swiss mice were obtained from a breeding colony held at the institutes’ Central Animal House and maintained according to the recommendations prescribed by the ACEC. Mice were housed under a controlled lighting regime (16L : 8D) at 21–22 °C and supplied with food and water ad libitum. Prior to dissection, animals were euthanized via CO2 inhalation. Immediately after adult male mice ( 8 weeks old) were euthanized, their epididymides and testes were removed and carefully dissected free of fat and overlying connective tissue. The caudal region was isolated, blotted free of blood and immersed under pre-warmed water-saturated mineral oil. Caudal spermatozoa were collected by back-flushing after which the perfusate was deposited into modified Biggers, Whitten and Whittingham media (BWW; Biggers etal., 1971) composed of 91.5 mm NaCl, 4.6 mm KCl, 1.7  mm CaCl2.2H2O, 1.2 mm KH2PO4, 1.2 mm MgSO4.7H2O, 25 mm NaHCO3, 5.6 mm D-glucose, 0.27 mm sodium pyruvate, 44 mm sodium lactate, 5 U/mL penicillin, 5 μg/mL streptomycin, 20 mm HEPES buffer and 3 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA), then allowed to disperse into the medium for 15 min. Where indicated, negative control (non-capacitated) incubations were conducted using medium prepared without NaHCO3 while positive control (capacitated) incubations were conducted in media supplemented with 1 mm pentoxifylline (ptx) and 1 mm dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate (dbcAMP). These treatments have been demonstrated to both suppress and promote sperm capacitation, respectively (Nixon etal., 2006). An osmolarity of 300 mOsm/kg was maintained in all media. Following collection, sperm concentration was determined and the cells diluted as required. Spermatozoa were then assessed for motility and the non-capacitated samples used immediately. Alternatively, populations of capacitated spermatozoa were prepared by incubation for 45 min at 37 °C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2: 95% air. At regular intervals throughout the incubation, sperm suspensions were gently mixed to prevent settling of the cells and, at the end of the incubation, sperm vitality and motility were again assessed. Neither parameter was affected by any of the treatments reported in this study. To prepare caput and corpus spermatozoa, the appropriate region of the epididymis was dissected and placed in a 500-μL droplet of BWW medium. Multiple incisions were then made in the tissue with a razor blade and spermatozoa gently washed into the medium with mild agitation. The resultant cell suspension was then layered over 27% Percoll and centrifuged (400× g for 15 min). The pellet, consisting of 95% pure spermatozoa, was washed by gentle centrifugation (400× g for 2 min) to remove excess Percoll and then resuspended in fresh BWW medium and counted as described above. Similarly, testicular spermatozoa were prepared by decapsulating the isolated testes, making multiple incisions in the tissue with a razor blade and allowing the cells to gently disperse into the medium with mild agitation. Formalin fixed testis tissue was embedded in paraffin and cut into 5 μm sections. Following de-waxing and rehydration, antigen retrieval was performed by microwaving (500 W) the sections for 20 min in citrate buffer (10 mm trisodium citrate, 4.4 mm HCl, pH 6.0). All subsequent incubations were performed at 37 °C in a humid chamber, and all antibody dilutions and washes were conducted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Sections were blocked at 37 °C for 1 h in 10% v/v normal rabbit serum supplemented with 3% w/v BSA in PBS. Slides were washed and incubated sequentially in primary antibody (diluted 1 : 100) and an appropriate Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (diluted 1 : 300). After washing, the sections were counterstained with 10 μg/mL propidium iodide, a nuclear dye included to aid morphological assessment. Slides were mounted in antifade reagent (13% Mowiol 4–88, 33% glycerol, 66 mm Tris (pH 8.5), 2.5% 1,4 diazobcyclo-[2.2.2]octane), and viewed using a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Laser Scanning Microscope 510, Thornwood, NY, USA). Sperm suspensions were lightly fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, solubilized in 0.2 m Triton X-100 for 20 min at 4 °C, and washed three times with 0.05 m glycine in PBS before being plated onto poly-l-lysine-coated glass slides. The cells were blocked with 10% rabbit serum/3% BSA for 1 h at 37 °C. Slides were washed with PBS prior to overnight incubation with primary antibody (diluted 1 : 100) at 4 °C. Slides were then subjected to three washes in PBS and incubated with an appropriate Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (diluted 1 : 300) for 1 h at 37 °C. Slides were again washed and mounted in antifade reagent before being viewed by confocal microscopy. For co-localization studies with CTB subunit, live sperm suspensions were mixed with an equal volume of Alexa Fluor 555-labelled CTB (10 μg/mL) and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. The cells were then washed four times in two volumes of BWW medium and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at 37 °C. The cells were aliquoted onto poly-l-lysine-coated glass slides and allowed to settle before being blocked with PBS supplemented with 3% BSA and 10% goat serum for 1 h at 37 °C. They were then sequentially labelled with the appropriate primary and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at 37 °C in a dark, humidified chamber. The slides were then mounted with antifade reagent and observed using a confocal microscope. To assess whether ADAMTS10 localization was influenced by the acrosomal status of spermatozoa, acrosomal exocytosis was induced by incubation of capacitated cells in 2.5 μm calcium ionophore A23187 for 30 min as previously described (Asquith etal., 2005). Sperm suspensions were then washed, resuspended in hypoosmotic swelling (HOS) medium (Jeyendran etal., 1984) and incubated for an additional 1 h. Following incubation, the cells were sequentially labelled with the appropriate primary and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies as indicated above. Spermatozoa were then dual-labelled with PNA conjugated to Alexa Fluor 594 and prepared for confocal microscopy as outlined above. Isolated spermatozoa were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/0.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 m phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) followed by dehydration, infiltration and embedding in LR White resin. Sections (70 nm) were cut on an Ultracut S ultramicrotome (Reichert-Jung, Austria) with a diamond knife (Diatome Ltd, Bienne, Switzerland) and placed on nickel grids. All antibody dilutions and washes for immunogold labelling were in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS; pH 7.4). Grids were treated with 0.05 m glycine dissolved in DPBS for 40 min followed by washing and blocking in 3% BSA in DPBS for 1 h at 37 °C. Primary antibody diluted to 1 : 25 was applied and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Grids were washed and incubated with 1 : 20 dilutions of secondary antibody conjugated to 10 nm gold particles for 2 h at 37 °C. After washing, sections were post-fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde, dried and stained with 1% uranyl acetate in 40% methanol. Micrographs were taken on a JEOL-100CX transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 80 kV. To assess the surface expression of ADAMTS10, live spermatozoa were sequentially incubated with anti-ADAMTS10 and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies for 15 min at 37 °C in a dark humidified chamber, before being washed twice in BWW. Spermatozoa were then counterstained with the vitality stain, propidium iodide (0.5 μm). After washing, the cells were analysed on a fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) Vantage flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). This system collects fluorescence data in logarithmic mode and light-scatter data in linear mode. Ten thousand cells were counted in each sample at a rate of 50–500 events/sec and data were analysed using the Cell Quest package (Becton Dickinson). Low-density Brij 35 insoluble membrane fractions [detergent-resistant membranes (DRMs)] were prepared from mouse spermatozoa as previously described (Nixon etal., 2009). Briefly, capacitated mouse spermatozoa were washed by gentle centrifugation (400× g for 1 min) and resuspended in 300 μL of 1% Brij 35 in 25 mm HEPES buffer (pH 6.5, 150 mm NaCl, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm PMSF, protease inhibitor cocktail). Following mechanical disruption of the cells by homogenization in a Dounce homogenizer (30 strokes), the cells were incubated for 30 min at 4 °C. Cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 10 000× g for 5 min and the supernatant, containing Brij 35-insoluble material, was then mixed with an equal volume of 80% sucrose (w/v) in 25 mm HEPES buffer for a final sucrose concentration of 40%. This suspension was placed in the bottom of an ultracentrifuge tube as the base of a discontinuous sucrose gradient. Additional layers consisting of 30% (980 μL) and 5% (620 μL) sucrose were carefully overlaid and the whole gradient was centrifuged at 100 000× g for 18 h at 4 °C in an SW41 rotor (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA). Following centrifugation, eleven 200-μL fractions were carefully extracted by pipette from the top of the gradients and assessed for their light-scattering properties by measurement of their absorbance at 620 nm and protein concentration using a BCA assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). The fractions were then stored at −20 °C prior to further analysis. Dot immunoassays were performed to examine the partitioning behaviour of GM1 gangliosides, and hence DRMs, within the sucrose gradient. Briefly, 50 μL of each of the isolated fractions were diluted 1 : 1 in PBS, added to wells of a Bio-Dot apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), suctioned onto nitrocellulose membranes and air-dried. The membrane was then blocked with 5% milk powder in TBST (10 mm Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mm NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated cholera toxin in TBST supplemented with 0.5% milk powder for 1 h. It was then washed five times with TBST and subsequently developed with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) assay (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) and exposed to Hyperfilm ECL. The protein composition of low-density Brij 35 insoluble membrane fractions prepared from mouse spermatozoa was assessed by SDS–PAGE and by immunoblotting analysis. For the purpose of SDS–PAGE, equivalent volumes of fractionated protein suspensions were precipitated with methanol/chloroform (2 : 1 v/v, respectively) to collect both the detergent soluble and insoluble proteins. Following centrifugation at 10 000× g for 1 min, the supernatant was discarded and an additional 300 μL methanol was added. The samples were then re-centrifuged at 10 000× g for 15 min and the supernatant discarded. The protein pellets obtained from either technique were allowed to air dry, then resolubilized and denatured by boiling in SDS sample buffer (Laemmli, 1970) containing 2%β-mercaptoethanol for 5 min and resolved on 10% SDS–polyacrylamide gels according to the methods described by Laemmli (1970). Resolved proteins were electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond Super-C; GE Healthcare) under a constant current of 300 mA for 1 h (Towbin etal., 1979) and prepared for immunoblotting with anti-ADAMTS10. At present, no functional data are available regarding ADAMTS10, thus precluding the use of a known specific inhibitor for functional studies on this protein. For this reason, two broader specificity inhibitors were employed. The first was tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease 3 (TIMP3), a physiological inhibitor of both matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and of several ADAMTS proteins (Kashiwagi etal., 2001). In addition, spermatozoa were treated with the broad spectrum metalloprotease inhibitor galardin (HONHCOCH2CH(i-Bu)CO-L-TRP-NHMe isomer 6A or GM6001; Grobelny etal., 1992). To assess the impact of such inhibitors, as well as anti-ADAMTS10 antibodies, on sperm–zona pellucida binding ability, populations of capacitating mouse spermatozoa were incubated with each reagent for 30 min at 37 °C. Following incubation, the spermatozoa were washed and an aliquot of 2 × 104 cells was then deposited into a droplet of BWW containing a minimum of eight salt-stored oocytes (Nixon etal., 2006). The gametes were co-incubated under oil in 5% CO2 for 30 min at 37 °C. Following incubation, the oocytes were washed three times by serial aspiration and then incubated for 5 min in a droplet of BWW supplemented with 5 μg/mL of the DNA-specific fluorochrome 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The oocytes were then washed in BWW and mounted on glass slides under coverslips supported on pillars comprising 80% paraffin wax and 20% Vaseline gel. The number of sperm bound to each zona was subsequently counted using both phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy and expressed as a percentage of the capacitated control sample. Following incubation under either capacitating or non-capacitating conditions, suspensions of 1 × 106 sperm/mL were lightly pelleted (300× g for 5 min) and resuspended in native protein lysis buffer (1% n-dodecyl β-d-maltoside, 0.5% Coomassie Blue G250 and a cocktail of protease inhibitors; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) as previously described (Dun etal., 2011). The samples were gently mixed and then incubated at 4 °C on an orbital rotator for 30 min. Following incubation, the lysate was recovered by centrifugation at 14 000× g for 20 min at 4 °C and dialyzed against the Blue native cathode buffer (Invitrogen), to remove excess salt and detergent. Following dialysis, the sample was supplemented with glycerol to a final concentration of 5% (v/v) and resolved on a pre-cast blue native polyacrylamide gel (NativePAGE Novex 4–16%, Bis-Tris; Invitrogen) using a NativePAGE cathode and anode buffer system (Invitrogen). The blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE) apparatus was placed at 4 °C and the samples separated at 100 V until the Coomassie dye front reached the bottom of the loading wells. The voltage was then increased to 200 V and the separation continued until the Coomassie dye front reached the bottom of the gel. The gels were then removed from the electrophoresis apparatus and stained with Coomassie G250. Alternatively, the gels were prepared for immunoblotting with anti-ADMTS10 using standard procedures. Approximately 60 μL (per treatment) of protein G magnetic beads (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) were washed three times in PBS. This was followed by conjugation with 5 μg of anti-ADAMTS10 antibody at 4 °C overnight with constant mixing. Following conjugation, the antibody–bead complexes were washed two times before being covalently cross-linked by incubation in 15 mm DTSSP (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 2 h at 4 °C. The cross-linking reaction was quenched using 1 m Tris and the conjugated beads were washed as above. A control sample of beads was also left non-conjugated and was incubated with PBS only. Both of the bead preparations were then incubated with approximately 100 μg of native sperm lysates (prepared as described above) that had been pre-cleared against non-conjugated beads to limit non-specific interactions. After an overnight incubation at 4 °C with constant mixing, the beads were washed three times prior to elution of bound proteins by incubation in 0.2 m glycine pH 2.5 for 15 min at room temperature. Precipitated proteins were resolved on 10% polyacrylamide gels and prepared for either silver staining or immunoblotting. To confirm the specificity of the predominant sperm protein recognized by anti-ADAMTS10 antibodies, the protein was excised from a duplicate gel, destained and dehydrated in acetonitrile before being rehydrated in a minimal volume of 20 mm ammonium bicarbonate containing 40 ng/μL trypsin for 16 h at 37 °C. The resulting tryptic peptides were purified using a ZipTip and sequenced by matrix-assisted laser desorption time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF) using an Ettan MALDI-ToF Pro mass spectrometer (GE Healthcare). Briefly, 1 μL fractions of the tryptic peptides were mixed with an equal volume of matrix solution (a saturated solution of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 0.1% TFA : acetonitrile, 50 : 50) before being applied in duplicate to the stainless steel sample target plates. The peptide mass spectra were acquired in the reflectron mode and internal mass calibration was performed with two trypsin auto-digestion fragments (842.5 and 2211.1 Da). Peptide mass fingerprints were used as inputs to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information nonredundant (NCBInr) database using the MASCOT search engine (http://www.matrixscience.com) with a probability-based scoring algorithm. Prior to the database search, known contamination peaks such as keratin and autoproteolysis peaks, were removed. Searches were performed without the restriction of protein molecular weight (Mr) or pI and with mandatory carbamidomethylation of cysteines and variable oxidation of methionine residues. One trypsin miscleavage was allowed. Peptide mass tolerance and fragment mass tolerance were set to 50 ppm and ±0.4 Da, respectively. High confidence identifications reported in Fig.S1 were those that possessed statistically significant search scores ( 95% confidence interval, equivalent to MASCOT expect value 0.05). All experiments were replicated with material collected from at least three different animals and the graphical data presented represent means ± SEM, the standard errors being calculated from the variance between samples. Statistical significance was determined using an anova. To facilitate characterization of ADAMTS10, a truncated recombinant protein incorporating the metalloprotease, disintegrin, cysteine-rich and spacer domains (amino acids 257–886, Fig.S1) was synthesized using an E. coli expression system. Unfortunately, despite attempting several variations of the expression protocol, the recombinant ADAMTS10 product proved largely insoluble. Although this precluded its use in functional assays, it was able to be used for the production of polyclonal antisera. The antisera were subsequently affinity-purified and assessed for their specificity by immunoblotting against cell lysates prepared from mouse lungs (positive control), testes and spermatozoa. As the results presented in Fig.1A demonstrate, the immune sera labelled a predominant protein of approximately 65 kDa in cell lysates prepared from either the mouse testes or lung. An additional band of approximately 120 kDa, corresponding to the size predicted for the full-length, glycosylated protein, was also present in the testes and lung samples, albeit of much lower intensity. In contrast, the predominant band observed in isolated epididymal spermatozoa was approximately 50 kDa. Although this protein was observed in all sperm samples analysed, the caput and corpus cells displayed an additional band of approximately 120 kDa, whereas an alternative weak band of 65 kDa was detected in corpus and cauda spermatozoa. Given the disparity between the predicted molecular weight of full-length and processed forms of ADAMTS10 (approximately 118 and 95 kDa, respectively; Somerville etal., 2004) and that observed experimentally, an additional commercial antibody raised against the catalytic domain was sourced to validate these results. Notwithstanding some minor differences, a similar profile of proteins was labelled with this additional antibody. Notably, a protein of approximately 50 kDa was again the predominant band labelled in cell lysates prepared from epididymal spermatozoa. Although such findings suggest the ADAMTS10 protein is extensively processed, the precise nature of these modification(s) remains to be fully investigated. Nevertheless, we were able to obtain partial amino acid sequence that confirmed the identity of the 50 kDa sperm protein as ADAMTS10 and demonstrate that this processed form retains the catalytic domain (Fig.S1). Validation of anti-ADAMTS10 antibodies. (A) Recombinant ADAMTS10 protein was used to generate rabbit polyclonal antisera. IgG was isolated by protein G chromatography and specific ADAMTS10 antibodies were affinity-purified against the recombinant ADAMTS10 immunogen. The purified post-immune antibodies were assessed for cross-reactivity in immunoblots of protein lysates prepared from mouse testes and lung, in addition to spermatozoa sampled from the caput, corpus and cauda epididymis (5 μg per lane). The latter samples were isolated from populations of both non-capacitated (NC) and capacitated (Cap) spermatozoa. After labelling, the blot was stripped and reprobed with anti-tubulin antibodies to confirm equal protein loading across all sperm samples. (B) To confirm antibody specificity, a replicate immunoblot was also probed with commercial antibodies directed against ADAMTS10. Each experiment was replicated three times and representative blots are depicted. ADAMTS10 is expressed in the peri-acrosomal region of developing spermatids and mature mouse spermatozoa Having confirmed the ability of ADAMTS10 antisera to detect the target protein in cell lysates prepared from mature spermatozoa, it was used in conjunction with indirect immunofluorescence to examine the ontogeny of ADAMTS10 expression within the testis and its localization in developing spermatozoa. As illustrated in Fig.2, ADAMTS10 was not able to be detected in developing germ cells lining the basal margin of the seminiferous tubules. Indeed, the first significant expression of the protein was not observed until the formation of round spermatids. Within these cells, ADAMTS10 staining was primarily localized to a discrete crescent pattern characteristic of that of the developing acrosomal vesicle (Fig.2A). Intense labelling of this domain remained apparent throughout the later stages of spermatogenesis and was clearly evident in the populations of elongating spermatids lining the luminal border of the seminiferous tubules (Fig.2B). Expression of ADAMTS10 protein in mouse testes. (A and B) Paraffin embedded sections of mouse testes were sequentially labelled with anti-ADAMTS10 and Alexa Fluor 488 (green) conjugated secondary antibodies. The sections were then counterstained with propidium iodide (red) to assist with morphological analysis. Control sections were prepared in which the primary antibody was substituted with either (C) buffer only (secondary only) or (D) pre-immune sera. This experiment was replicated three times and representative images are shown. Scale bar = 100 μm. To confirm acrosomal localization, enriched populations of round and elongating spermatids were prepared by sediment gradient isolation. These cells were then fixed, permeabilized and labelled with anti-ADAMTS10 before being counterstained with PNA, a marker of the acrosomal membrane (Mortimer etal., 1987). Consistent with the results secured by immunohistochemistry of whole testes sections (Fig.2), ADAMTS10 expression was initially detected in round spermatids (Fig.3). Although diffuse labelling of ADAMTS10 was present throughout these cells, an intense pattern of crescent shaped labelling was also apparent. Strong co-localization with PNA confirmed that this labelling pattern corresponded to that of the developing acrosomal vesicle. A similar pattern of acrosomal labelling was also observed in elongating spermatids (Fig.3), raising the possibility that ADAMTS10 is either involved in cytological remodelling of the spermatogenic cells leading to the formation of the acrosomal vesicle and/or that the protein is transported into this domain during formation of the organelle to fulfil an important function in mature spermatozoa. Co-localization of ADAMTS10 with PNA in isolated populations of developing spermatozoa. Enriched populations of round and elongating spermatids were isolated via sediment gradient filtration and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. They were then sequentially labelled with anti-ADAMTS10 and appropriate Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (green) followed by Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated PNA (red). Immunofluorescent labelling was detected using confocal microscopy. This experiment was replicated three times and representative images are shown. Scale bar = 10 μm. To begin to investigate the latter possibility, immunolocalization studies were undertaken to examine the profile of ADAMTS10 expression in maturing spermatozoa recovered from the male reproductive tract. Initial studies conducted on populations of fixed and permeabilized spermatozoa revealed that ADAMTS10 was strongly localized within the peri-acrosomal region of these cells. This pattern of ADAMTS10 localization appeared to be similar in mouse spermatozoa recovered from the testis and the different regions of the epididymis, and it did not appear to be noticeably influenced by the capacitation status of these cells (Fig.4A). An additional focus of protein localization was observed within the sperm tail; however, this appeared to change from predominantly principal piece to a more punctate pattern during epididymal maturation. The specificity of these labelling patterns was confirmed by the absence of staining in the secondary only (prepared by substituting the primary antibody with media alone) and pre-immune controls. Expression of ADAMTS10 in mature mouse spermatozoa. (A) Populations of spermatozoa were isolated from mouse testis, caput, corpus and cauda epididymis. The latter samples were either held in a non-capacitated state (NC) or driven to capacitate (Cap). The cells were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde and permeablized with 0.2 m Triton X-100 before being sequentially labelled with anti-ADAMTS10 and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (green) and counterstained with DAPI (blue). Control samples were prepared in which the anti-ADAMTS10 antibodies were substituted with either buffer alone (secondary only) or pre-immune sera. This experiment was replicated three times and representative images are shown. Scale bar = 10 μm. (B) To examine the surface expression of ADAMTS10, live populations of spermatozoa were labelled with anti-ADAMTS10 and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies before being counterstained with the vitality stain, propidium iodide. In addition to secondary antibody only controls, a positive control population of spermatozoa were prepared by labelling the cells with anti-flotillin antibodies. Sperm surface labelling was then analysed using a fluorescence-activated cell sorter. Data represent the mean ± standard error of the mean from three separate experiments. *p   0.05, **p   0.01. (C) The surface localization of ADAMTS10 in these capacitated spermatozoa was assessed by labelling live populations with anti-ADAMTS10 and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (green) and counterstaining with DAPI (blue). The presence of the ADAMTS10 within the peri-acrosomal region of mature spermatozoa is of potential interest as it intuitively suggests that the protein may participate in the cascade of sperm–oocyte interactions that underpin fertilization. However, as the previous study was conducted on populations of permeabilized spermatozoa, these data provide limited insight into the surface expression characteristics of the protein. A flow cytometry assay was therefore conducted to facilitate the objective measurement of surface protein expression in live cells and the exclusion of dead or moribund cells (identified through incorporation of a cell viability stain). As shown in Fig.4B, ADAMTS10 was expressed on the surface of 5% of live spermatozoa recovered from the testis, or caput and corpus epididymis. The absence of surface labelling in these cells suggests that ADAMTS10 must reside in an intracellular location. This was confirmed by ultrastructural localization of ADAMTS10, which revealed that the protein was predominantly expressed in the outer acrosomal membrane of these cells (Fig.S2). Interestingly, however, a marked increase in surface expression of ADAMTS10 was detected following sperm entry into the caudal region of the epididymis and a further dramatic increase was again detected following the induction of capacitation in this population of cells. The analysis of these cells by immunofluorescence microscopy confirmed that surface labelling was primarily restricted to the peri-acrosomal region of the sperm head (Fig.4C). Our interpretation of the collective data secured in the previous studies is that ADAMTS10 represents a novel sperm protein with a potentially important role in the cellular interactions that underpin fertilization. As a number of proteins that mediate these interactions have been shown to preferentially partition into membrane rafts, it was of interest to confirm that the ADAMTS10 resides within these microdomains and determine whether it complexes with additional proteins in capacitated mouse spermatozoa. Analysis of raft association was achieved via co-immunolocalization of ADAMTS10 with fluorescently labelled CTB subunit, a pentameric label that binds with high affinity to GM1 gangliosides, one of the key components of sperm membrane raft microdomains. As shown in Fig.5A, ADAMTS10 displayed strong co-localization with CTB within the peri-acrosomal region of the head of the majority of capacitated spermatozoa, thus suggesting that it is expressed within membrane raft microdomains in this region of the cell. This interpretation is consistent with the results of immunoblotting experiments in which ADAMTS10 was shown to be abundantly expressed in the light buoyant-density DRM fractions expected of a raft-resident protein (Fig.5B, fractions 5 and 6). Co-localization of ADAMTS10 proteins with cholera toxin subunit B (CTB) in mouse spermatozoa. (A) The ability of ADAMTS10 to partition in sperm membrane rafts in situ was examined by co-localization with the raft marker, GM1, in live capacitated spermatozoa. For this purpose, membrane rafts were visualized by staining live spermatozoa with Alexa Fluor 555-labelled CTB subunit (red). The cells were then fixed and labelled with anti-ADAMTS10 and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (green). This experiment was replicated three times with a minimum of 200 spermatozoa being examined in each replicate and representative images are shown. (B) The partitioning behaviour of ADAMTS10 into buoyant, low-density membrane fractions was examined following fractionation of detergent-resistant membranes within a sucrose gradient. Each of the 11 fractions recovered from the sucrose gradient lysate were prepared for dot-blotting with CTB or immunoblotting with anti-ADAMTS10 and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. Each experiment was replicated three times and representative data are shown. Scale bar = 5 μm. To achieve the second goal of determining whether ADAMTS10 constitutes part of a multimeric protein complex, native sperm lysates were resolved by BN-PAGE (Fig.6A) before being immunoblotted with anti-ADAMTS10 antibodies (Fig.6B). This analysis revealed cross-reactivity between ADAMTS10 antibodies and at least three high-molecular protein bands of approximately 240, 740 and 800 kDa (Fig.6B). The apparent molecular weight of these bands is considerably higher than that expected for monomeric ADAMTS10, thus raising the prospect that the protein is assembled into either homomeric or heteromeric complex(es) on the sperm surface. As our previous studies have implicated the molecular chaperone, HSPD1, in the assembly of multimeric protein complexes on the surface of mouse spermatozoa (Asquith etal., 2004), it was of interest that we could demonstrate the presence of at least two putative complexes that harboured both proteins (Fig.6C, arrowheads). Evidence in support of an ADAMTS10–HSPD1 interaction was provided by the demonstration that both proteins co-localize within the peri-acrosomal region of mouse spermatozoa (Fig.6D) and HSPD1 was able to be co-precipitated from native sperm lysates using anti-ADAMTS10 antibodies (Fig.6E). In addition, we were able to use this approach to confirm that both anti-ADAMTS10 antibodies recognized the same 50-kDa isoform of the protein (Fig.6E) Examination of whether ADAMTS10 constitutes part of a multimeric sperm protein complex. Native sperm lysates were resolved by (A) 1D BN-PAGE and (B,C) transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were then probed with (B) anti-ADAMTS10 antibodies or (C) anti-HSPD1 antibodies. This experiment was replicated three times and a representative BN-PAGE gel and immunoblots are shown. Arrowheads indicate protein bands that were labelled with both anti-ADAMTS10 and anti-HSPD1 antibodies. (D) The putative interaction between ADAMTS10 and HSPD1 was investigated by co-localization of the proteins in mouse spermatozoa. For this purpose, spermatozoa were stained with anti-ADAMTS10 (red) followed by anti-HSD1 (green) and appropriate Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies. This experiment was replicated three times with a minimum of 200 spermatozoa being examined in each replicate and representative images are shown. Scale bar = 5 μm. (E) The ADAMTS10/HSPD1 interaction was further investigated through the use of a co-immunoprecipitation strategy in which native lysates prepared from capacitated spermatozoa were immunoprecipitated with anti-ADAMTS10. Experimental controls included proteins recovered by boiling non-conjugated beads (beads only), proteins recovered from boiling non-conjugated beads following their incubation with native lysate (preclear), whole sperm native lysate (native lysate), anti-ADAMTS10 antibodies only (antibody only), and the first and final bead washes (wash 1 and wash 3, respectively). Proteins that were eluted from ADAMTS10-conjugated beads following their incubation with native sperm lysates were resolved in the final lane (elution). Following separation of the proteins, they were transferred to nitrocellulose and immunoblotted with the anti-ADAMTS10 antibodies prepared in our laboratory (anti-ADAMTS10*) to confirm the efficacy of the immunoprecipitation, before being stripped and reprobed with commercial anti-ADAMTS10 (anti-ADAMTS10**) to confirm both antibodies recognized the same 50-kDa isoform of the protein. The membrane was then re-stripped and probed with anti-HSPD1. The arrowheads indicate proteins corresponding to ADAMTS10 and HSPD1. To further characterize the properties of ADAMTS10, its expression was examined following induction of acrosomal exocytosis. The rationale for this study is based on well-established evidence that proteins involved in primary sperm–zona pellucida interaction are lost, along with the apical plasma membrane in which they reside, following acrosomal exocytosis. As anticipated, the induction of the acrosome reaction with the calcium ionophore A23187 led to a complete loss of PNA staining within the peri-acrosomal region of approximately 50–60% of the capacitated sperm population (Fig.7A). Acrosomal loss in each of these cells was also accompanied by a dramatic reduction in ADAMTS10 labelling within the sperm head (Fig.7B). Examination of ADAMTS10 behaviour in acrosome reacted spermatozoa. Capacitated populations of mouse spermatozoa were induced to acrosome react through incubation with the calcium ionophore, A23187. Following the induction of acrosomal exocytosis, the cells were incubated in HOS media prior to being sequentially labelled with anti-ADAMTS10 and appropriate Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies (green) followed by Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated PNA (red). Immunofluorescent labelling of viable cells was detected using confocal microscopy. This experiment was replicated three times and representative images are shown. Scale bar = 5 μm. In view of the data presented above, inhibitory studies were undertaken to begin to investigate the function of ADAMTS10 in mouse spermatozoa. In the absence of specific pharmacological inhibitors of ADAMTS10 function, we instead employed the use of two broad specificity metalloprotease inhibitors: TIMP3, a physiological inhibitor of both MMPs and of several ADAMTS proteins (Hashimoto etal., 2001; Kashiwagi etal., 2001), and galardin, a hydroxamic acid known to act as a broad spectrum inhibitor of metalloprotease activity (Grobelny etal., 1992). At the concentrations employed in the present study (5–100 ng/mL), TIMP3 failed to elicit any marked impact on zona pellucida recognition and adhesion (Fig.8A). The use of higher concentrations of this inhibitor was negated by the severe adverse effects it had on sperm viability. In contrast, galardin affected a dose-dependent decrease in zona binding in the absence of noticeable effects on sperm motility or viability (Fig.8B). Similarly, substitution of the inhibitors with anti-ADAMTS10 antisera (20 μg/mL) also elicited a marked reduction in sperm adhesion to homologous zonae pellucidae (Fig.8C). Indeed, the degree of zona interaction was decreased by approximately fourfold to levels that were comparable with those seen in the non-capacitated sperm controls. Importantly, this suppression was not related to a reduction in sperm viability or motility following antibody treatment as both parameters remained at levels comparable with those seen in the untreated controls. The specificity of this inhibition was further attested to by the failure of pre-immune sera (20 μg/mL) or anti-CD59 (20 μg/mL) antibodies to elicit any impact on sperm–zona pellucida interaction. In contrast to the results secured for sperm–zona pellucida binding, anti-ADAMTS10 antibodies had no discernible effect on either sperm–oolemma binding or fusion (results not shown). Effect of metalloprotease inhibitors on sperm–zona pellucida interactions. Cauda epididymal spermatozoa were capacitated in the presence of varying doses metalloprotease inhibitors (TIMP3 or galardin) or anti-ADAMTS10 antibodies (20 μg/mL). (A–C) They were then assessed for the ability to adhere to homologous zonae pellucidae. (A and B) Control samples contained vehicle (DMSO) at the same dilution used in the highest inhibitor concentration or (C) pre-immune sera (20 μg/mL) and antibodies against an alternative sperm surface protein (CD59; 20 μg/mL). The mean number of spermatozoa bound per oocyte was recorded and expressed as a percentage of the capacitated control, which typically bound at a rate of approximately 30–40 spermatozoa/oocyte. Data represent the results of three replicates and are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. *p   0.05, **p   0.01. The focus of the studies described herein has been the characterization of the novel sperm protein ADAMTS10, a recently identified member of the metalloprotease superfamily. Since the first description of the ADAMTS family by Kuno etal. (1997), a total of 19 mammalian ADAMTS proteins have now been identified (Apte, 2009), which possess unique and overlapping functional roles in diverse biological processes ranging from cell migration, connective tissue organization, regulation of angiogenesis and blood coagulation, arthritis and the regulation of fertility (Flannery etal., 1999; Georgiadis etal., 1999; Hurskainen etal., 1999; Shindo etal., 2000; Li etal., 2001; Zheng etal., 2001; Cal etal., 2002; Russell etal., 2003; Richards, 2005; Stanton etal., 2005). At present, there is very limited information regarding the expression of ADAMTS proteins in mammalian spermatozoa. Indeed, only a single study has implicated ADAMTS in sperm function with a report that ADAMTS2 knockout mice are characterized by a male infertility phenotype attributed to defects in spermatogenesis (Li etal., 2001). In contrast, the endogenous inhibitors of this metalloprotease family, including TIMPs, have been identified in the male reproductive tract (Kirchhoff etal., 1991; Robinson etal., 2001; Metayer etal., 2002) and on spermatozoa (Buchman-Shaked etal., 2002), thus strengthening the case for metalloprotease regulation of male reproductive function. As with other ADAMTS family members, ADAMTS10 is synthesized as a zymogen, possessing an N-terminal signal sequence (Met1-Ala25) followed by a short prodomain that functions to preserve enzymatic latency and aids in correct protein folding and secretion (Cao etal., 2000). Experimental evidence secured by Somerville etal. (2004) has demonstrated that furin, a proprotein convertase that is expressed in the testes and epididymis of various mammalian species (Torii etal., 1993; Thimon etal., 2006), is the enzyme most likely responsible for zymogen processing. The amino terminus of the mature protease is predicted to commence at Ser234, immediately upstream of the catalytic domain. This metalloprotease domain is highly conserved, possessing a characteristic zinc-binding signature commonly found in reprolysin-type metalloproteases, the disintegrin-like domain and the first of five thrombospondin type I repeat (TSR) motifs. The presence of the HEXXH consensus sequence is suggestive of catalytic activity (Tang, 2001), and indeed, the metalloprotease activity of ADAMTS10, and several other ADAMTS proteins, is now well established in vitro (Abbaszade etal., 1999; Kuno etal., 1999; Tortorella etal., 1999; Somerville etal., 2004). On the contrary, the ADAMTS disintegrin-like domains have not yet been shown to possess disintegrin activity (Apte, 2004) and the consensus X(D/E)ECD site responsible for integrin binding is not well conserved in the ADAMTS family. Importantly, the work of Somerville etal. (2004) has demonstrated that ADAMTS10 is secreted to the cell surface and is a functional metalloprotease capable of cleaving α2-macroglbulin. One curiosity arising from our characterization of ADAMTS10 was that the molecular weight of the predominant protein (50 kDa) recognized in epididymal spermatozoa by anti-ADAMTS10 antibodies differs substantially from that predicted on the basis of the primary sequence for either the full-length zymogen or that of the processed mature form of the protein (118 and 95 kDa, respectively). Although post-translational modifications, such as the documented N-glycosylation of ADAMTS10, are known to influence protein resolution in SDS–PAGE gels, it is considered unlikely that they alone could account for such large discrepancies in electrophoretic mobility. Although exploration of the origin of this alternative-sized protein proved beyond the scope of the present work, it is considered likely that it originates from additional cleavage of the parent protein. The latter explanation is consistent with experimental evidence that proteolytic cleavage does occur in the ancillary C-terminal domains of other ADAMTS proteins (Vazquez etal., 1999; Rodriguez-Manzaneque etal., 2000; Cal etal., 2001; Gao etal., 2002; Somerville etal., 2003). Such cleavage events generally occur within the spacer region (Vazquez etal., 1999; Rodriguez-Manzaneque etal., 2000; Flannery etal., 2002; Gao etal., 2002, 2004) and have been shown to elicit a profound impact on both substrate specificity and localization of the enzymes. In the best characterized example, ADAMTS4 has been shown to undergo autocatalytic C-terminal processing from a 75-kDa full-length active form to produce isoforms of 60 and 50 kDa (Flannery etal., 2002; Gao etal., 2004). Such processing results in the release of the enzyme from the ECM and dramatic alteration of its bioactivity (Gao etal., 2002) with, for instance, the aggrecanase activity profile being reduced to 1% of normal (Kashiwagi etal., 2004). In the case of ADAMTS10, it has recently been reported that the protein is highly susceptible to C-terminal processing events, analogous to those reported for ADAMTS4, if the protein is expressed in cells cultured in the absence of serum, and hence the protective activity of the proteolytic inhibitors contained therein (Somerville etal., 2004). Although further studies are required to investigate the nature of ADAMTS10 processing, it was of considerable interest that post-testicular sperm maturation was identified as the likely staging site for proteolytic cleavage and activation of the ADAMTS10 zymogen. This situation is analogous with that reported for several members of the related ADAM protein family. Indeed many of the ADAM proteins that have proven to be instrumental in male reproductive function are regulated by proteolytic processing during epididymal passage (Schlondorff & Blobel, 1999). The significance of such processing is emphasized by reports that they occur in concert with the acquisition of sperm fertilizing ability in the epididymis (Aitken etal., 2007). It was also of interest that the surface labelling of ADAMTS10 increased dramatically following sperm capacitation and that the protein co-localized with membrane raft markers in these cells. These findings share striking similarities to our previous data on HSPD1 (Asquith etal., 2004) and that secured by independent laboratories regarding ZP3R (Kim etal., 2001; Kim & Gerton, 2003; Buffone etal., 2008) and a number of additional proteins (Tulsiani & Abou-Haila, 2004) that are progressively released to the sperm surface during capacitation. At present, the mechanisms underpinning the maturation-associated changes in the localization of ADAMTS10 remain to be fully explored but they may be mediated through the formation of small fusion pores between the outer acrosomal membrane and the overlying plasma membrane (Dun etal., 2010). Irrespective of the mechanisms, the localization of ADAMTS10 in capacitated spermatozoa raises the prospect that it may participate in sperm–oocyte interactions. However, the dearth of functional data regarding ADAMTS10 prohibited the use of specific inhibitors to examine this role. Instead, two broad spectrum metalloprotease inhibitors were employed, TIMP3 and galardin. TIMPs are small, disulphide-bonded proteins that are broadly effective competitive inhibitors of the MMPs, yet display much greater selectivity towards both the ADAMs and ADAMTSs (Baker etal., 2002). TIMP3 is the only known endogenous ADAMTS inhibitor, and has been shown to potently inhibit mouse gamete fusion (Correa etal., 2000). However, the current study revealed that TIMP3 does not influence the initial binding event between capacitated spermatozoa and the zona pellucida. In contrast, the treatment of spermatozoa with galardin, an alternative broad spectrum metalloprotease inhibitor (Grobelny etal., 1992), initiated a dose-dependent decrease in their affinity for the zona pellucida in the absence of an effect on sperm motility or viability. Although these data do not directly implicate ADAMTS10 in the initial stages of gamete interaction, they do provide evidence for the involvement of metalloproteases in this process and support the contention that this enzyme activity is an important determinant of sperm–zona interaction. This claim is further substantiated by the use of anti-ADAMTS10 antisera, which also proved effective in reducing sperm–ZP interaction. However, we acknowledge that caution must be exercised in interpreting experiments using antibody-based inhibition of zona interaction because of the possibility of non-specific steric hindrance. It therefore remains to be equivocally established whether ADAMTS10 directly binds ligands within the zona pellucida. An alternative hypothesis that is in keeping with the localization of this protein, its putative interaction with the molecular chaperone HSPD1, and the fact that it resides in a multimeric protein complex, is that the proteolytic ‘sheddase’ activity of ADAMTS10 is required to facilitate the unmasking, maturation and/or activation of proteins involved sperm–oocyte interactions. In this context, the identification of ADAMTS10 as a putative binding partner of a cell surface chaperone draws interesting parallels with recent reports that MMPs, such as MMP2 and MMP9, also form dynamic associations with molecular chaperones on the surface of certain tumour cells (Eustace etal., 2004; Stellas etal., 2010). In this capacity, the molecular chaperones assist in the activation of the matrix metalloproteinase, thereby promoting increased tumour invasiveness (Eustace & Jay, 2004; Eustace etal., 2004). Further, antibodies that disrupt these interactions are demonstrably capable of preventing metalloprotease activation and significantly inhibiting the metastatic potential of carcinoma cell lines (Stellas etal., 2010). In the case of spermatozoa, it has been shown that targeted deletion of molecular chaperones, such as calmegin and calsperin, results in a male infertility phenotype associated with impaired sperm transport in the female reproductive tract in vivo and the loss of sperm–zona binding ability (Ikawa etal., 1997, 2011). These defects in sperm function appear to be as a result of misexpression, misprocessing and/or misfolding of fertilization-dependent proteins. Indeed, these chaperones appear to be required for ADAM1A/ADAM2 dimerization and/or subsequent maturation of ADAM3 (Ikawa etal., 1997, 2001, 2010, 2011). It is therefore not surprising that these infertility phenotypes are mirrored by those reported in reciprocal knockouts of ADAM2 and ADAM3 proteins and that spermatozoa in the latter models also experience the loss of multiple gene products (Nishimura etal., 2001, 2004). Although comparable knockout studies of ADAMTS10 are required to determine whether this protein similarly affects the expression profile of other proteins and contributes to defective sperm function, these collective findings raise the possibility that extracellular interaction between chaperones and metalloproteases may be a widespread phenomenon that regulates a range of biological and pathological processes. Overall, these studies support the notion that sperm–oocyte interactions involve considerable functional redundancy and identify ADAMTS10 as a novel candidate in the mediation of these fundamentally important events. Future investigation of ADAMTS10, focusing on the elucidation of its substrates and hence the proteolytic pathways in which it participates, is required to determine its precise role in the regulation of sperm function. The authors acknowledge the expert assistance of Amanda Bielanowicz in preparation of the electron microscopy images presented herein. We also thank Prof. Suneel S. Apte (Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland) for providing valuable feedback and reagents during the early phase of these studies. This work was supported by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (569235) and the Research Management Committee, University of Newcastle, Australia. Figure S1. Structure of mouse ADAMTS10. Figure S2. Immunogold labeling of ADAMTS10 in mouse spermatozoa. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. etal. (1999) Cloning and characterization of ADAMTS11, an aggrecanase from the ADAMTS family. J Biol Chem 274, 23443– 23450.Lee YH & Baker MA. (2007) Proteomic changes in mammalian spermatozoa during epididymal maturation. Asian J Androl 9, 554– 564. Apte SS. (2004) A disintegrin-like and metalloprotease (reprolysin type) with thrombospondin type 1 motifs: the ADAMTS family. Int J Biochem Cell B 36, 981– 985. Apte SS. (2009) A disintegrin-like and metalloprotease (reprolysin-type) with thrombospondin type 1 motif (ADAMTS) superfamily: functions and mechanisms. J Biol Chem 284, 31493– 31497.Nixon B & Aitken RJ. (2004) Tyrosine phosphorylation activates surface chaperones facilitating sperm-zona recognition. J Cell Sci 117, 3645– 3657.Nixon B & Aitken RJ. (2005) Localization and significance of molecular chaperones, heat shock protein 1, and tumor rejection antigen gp96 in the male reproductive tract and during capacitation and acrosome reaction. Biol Reprod 72, 328– 337.Edwards DR & Murphy G. (2002) Metalloproteinase inhibitors: biological actions and therapeutic opportunities. J Cell Sci 115, 3719– 3727.Whitten WK & Whittingham DG. (1971) The culture of mouse embryos in vitro. In: Methods in Mammalian Embryology (ed JC Daniel), pp. 86– 116. Freeman Press, San Francisco, CA.Primakoff P & White JM. (1992) A potential fusion peptide and an integrin ligand domain in a protein active in sperm-egg fusion. Nature 356, 248– 252.Brewis IA & Gadella BM. (2008) Capacitation-dependent reorganization of microdomains in the apical sperm head plasma membrane: functional relationship with zona binding and the zona-induced acrosome reaction. Theriogenology 70, 1188– 1196. etal. (2006) Sperm capacitation induces an increase in lipid rafts having zona pellucida binding ability and containing sulfogalactosylglycerolipid. Dev Biol 290, 220– 235.Gonen Y & Goldman S. (2002) Presence of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase in human sperm. J Androl 23, 702– 708.Fernandez PL & Lopez-Otin C. (2001) Identification, characterization, and intracellular processing of ADAM-TS12, a novel human disintegrin with a complex structural organization involving multiple thrombospondin-1 repeats. J Biol Chem 276, 17932– 17940.Quesada V & Lopez-Otin C. (2002) Cloning, expression analysis, and structural characterization of seven novel human ADAMTSs, a family of metalloproteinases with disintegrin and thrombospondin-1 domains. Gene 283, 49– 62.Bahou WF & Zucker S. (2000) The propeptide domain of membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase acts as an intramolecular chaperone when expressed in trans with the mature sequence in COS-1 cells. J Biol Chem 275, 29648– 29653.Primakoff P & Myles DG. (1998) Fertilization defects in sperm from mice lacking fertilin beta. Science 281, 1857– 1859.Myles DG & Primakoff P. (2000) A role for a TIMP-3-sensitive, Zn(2+)-dependent metalloprotease in mammalian gamete membrane fusion. Dev Biol 225, 124– 134.Aitken RJ & Nixon B. (2010) Sperm-zona pellucida interaction: molecular mechanisms and the potential for contraceptive intervention. Handb Exp Pharmacol 198, 139– 178.Aitken RJ & Nixon B. (2011) The chaperonin containing TCP1 complex (CCT/TRiC) is involved in mediating sperm-oocyte interaction. J Biol Chem 286, 36875– 36887. etal. (2004) Functional proteomic screens reveal an essential extracellular role for hsp90 alpha in cancer cell invasiveness. Nat Cell Biol 6, 507– 514. Evans JP. (2001) Fertilin beta and other ADAMs as integrin ligands: insights into cell adhesion and fertilization. Bioessays 23, 628– 639.Hughes CE & Caterson B. (1999) Expression of ADAMTS homologues in articular cartilage. Biochem Bioph Res Co 260, 318– 322. etal. (2002) Autocatalytic cleavage of ADAMTS-4 (Aggrecanase-1) reveals multiple glycosaminoglycan-binding sites. J Biol Chem 277, 42775– 42780. Gadella BM. (2008) The assembly of a zona pellucida binding protein complex in sperm. Reprod Domest Anim 43(Suppl 5), 12– 19.Brewis IA. (2008) Sperm head membrane reorganisation during capacitation. Int J Dev Biol 52, 473– 480.Gottschall PE & Sandy JD. (2002) Activation of the proteolytic activity of ADAMTS4 (aggrecanase-1) by C-terminal truncation. J Biol Chem 277, 11034– 11041.Zuo F & Sandy JD. (2004) ADAMTS4 (aggrecanase-1) activation on the cell surface involves C-terminal cleavage by glycosylphosphatidyl inositol-anchored membrane type 4-matrix metalloproteinase and binding of the activated proteinase to chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate on syndecan-1. J Biol Chem 279, 10042– 10051.Seldin MF & Apte SS. (1999) ADAM-TS8, a novel metalloprotease of the ADAM-TS family located on mouse chromosome 9 and human chromosome 11. Genomics 62, 312– 315.Brouwers JF & Gadella BM. (2005) Capacitation-dependent concentration of lipid rafts in the apical ridge head area of porcine sperm cells. Mol Hum Reprod 11, 583– 590.Brouwers JF & Gadella BM. (2007) Multiple proteins present in purified porcine sperm apical plasma membranes interact with the zona pellucida of the oocyte. Mol Hum Reprod 13, 445– 454.Poncz L & Galardy RE. (1992) Inhibition of human skin fibroblast collagenase, thermolysin, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa elastase by peptide hydroxamic acids. Biochemistry 31, 7152– 7154.Tanzawa K & Okada Y. (2001) Inhibition of ADAMTS4 (aggrecanase-1) by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP-1, 2, 3 and 4). FEBS Lett 494, 192– 195.Seldin MF & Apte SS. (1999) ADAM-TS5, ADAM-TS6, and ADAM-TS7, novel members of a new family of zinc metalloproteases. General features and genomic distribution of the ADAM-TS family. J Biol Chem 274, 25555– 25563.Nishimune Y & Okabe M. (1997) The putative chaperone calmegin is required for sperm fertility. Nature 387, 607– 611.Nishimune Y & Okabe M. (2001) Calmegin is required for fertilin alpha/beta heterodimerization and sperm fertility. Dev Biol 240, 254– 261.Benham AM & Okabe M. (2010) Fertilization: a sperm’s journey to and interaction with the oocyte. J Clin Invest 120, 984– 994.Inoue N & Okabe M. (2011) Calsperin is a testis specific chaperone required for sperm fertility. J Biol Chem 286, 5639– 5646.Crabo BG & Zaneveld LJ. (1984) Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fertil 70, 219– 228.Nagase H & Brew K. (2001) TIMP-3 is a potent inhibitor of aggrecanase 1 (ADAM-TS4) and aggrecanase 2 (ADAM-TS5). J Biol Chem 276, 12501– 12504.Itoh Y & Nagase H. (2004) Altered proteolytic activities of ADAMTS-4 expressed by C-terminal processing. J Biol Chem 279, 10109– 10119. Kim KS & Gerton GL. (2003) Differential release of soluble and matrix components: evidence for intermediate states of secretion during spontaneous acrosomal exocytosis in mouse sperm. Dev Biol 264, 141– 152.Cha MC & Gerton GL. (2001) Mouse sperm protein sp56 is a component of the acrosomal matrix. Biol Reprod 64, 36– 43.Ivell R & Krull N. (1991) A major human epididymis-specific cDNA encodes a protein with sequence homology to extracellular proteinase inhibitors. Biol Reprod 45, 350– 357.Ohno S & Matsushima K. (1997) The exon/intron organization and chromosomal mapping of the mouse ADAMTS-1 gene encoding an ADAM family protein with TSP motifs. Genomics 46, 466– 471.Terashima Y & Matsushima K. (1999) ADAMTS-1 is an active metalloproteinase associated with the extracellular matrix. J Biol Chem 274, 18821– 18826. Laemmli UK. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680– 685.Helminen HJ & Prockop DJ. (2001) Transgenic mice with inactive alleles for procollagen N-proteinase (ADAMTS-2) develop fragile skin and male sterility. Biochem J 355, 271– 278.Dacheux JL & Gatti JL. (2002) Comparison, characterization, and identification of proteases and protease inhibitors in epididymal fluids of domestic mammals. Matrix metalloproteinases are major fluid gelatinases. Biol Reprod 66, 1219– 1229.Curtis EF & Miller RG. (1987) Specific labelling by peanut agglutinin of the outer acrosomal membrane of the human spermatozoon. J Reprod Fertil 81, 127– 135.Myles DG & Primakoff P. (2001) Analysis of loss of adhesive function in sperm lacking cyritestin or fertilin beta. Dev Biol 233, 204– 213.Nakanishi T & Baba T. (2004) Possible function of the ADAM1a/ADAM2 Fertilin complex in the appearance of ADAM3 on the sperm surface. J Biol Chem 279, 34957– 34962.Asquith KL & Aitken RJ. (2005) The role of molecular chaperones in mouse sperm-egg interactions. Mol Cell Endocrinol 72, 328– 337.O’Bryan M & Aitken RJ. (2006) The identification of mouse sperm-surface-associated proteins and characterization of their ability to act as decapacitation factors. Biol Reprod 74, 275– 287.Aitken RJ & McLaughlin EA. (2007) New insights into the molecular mechanisms of sperm-egg interaction. Cell Mol Life Sci 64, 1805– 1823.Ensslin MA & Aitken RJ. (2009) Composition and significance of detergent resistant membranes in mouse spermatozoa. J Cell Physiol 218, 122– 134.O’Bryan MK & Aitken RJ. (2011) Proteomic and functional analysis of human sperm detergent resistant membranes. J Cell Physiol 226, 2651– 2665. Primakoff P & Myles DG. (2000) The ADAM gene family: surface proteins with adhesion and protease activity. Trends Genet 16, 83– 87.Hyatt H & Tredick-Kline J. (1987) Identification and purification of a sperm surface protein with a potential role in sperm-egg membrane fusion. J Cell Biol 104, 141– 149. Richards JS. (2005) Ovulation: new factors that prepare the oocyte for fertilization. Mol Cell Endocrinol 234, 75– 79.Riley SC & Anderson RA. (2001) Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in human fetal testis and ovary. Mol Hum Reprod 7, 641– 648.Leduc R & Iruela-Arispe ML. (2000) Characterization of METH-1/ADAMTS1 processing reveals two distinct active forms. J Biol Chem 275, 33471– 33479.Sandy JD & Richards JS. (2003) Processing and localization of ADAMTS-1 and proteolytic cleavage of versican during cumulus matrix expansion and ovulation. J Biol Chem 278, 42330– 42339. Schlondorff J & Blobel CP. (1999) Metalloprotease-disintegrins: modular proteins capable of promoting cell-cell interactions anxd triggering signals by protein-ectodomain shedding. J Cell Sci 112, 3603– 3617.Oberwinkler H & Engel W. (1999) Male mice deficient for germ-cell cyritestin are infertile. Biol Reprod 61, 1445– 1451. etal. (2000) ADAMTS-1: a metalloproteinase-disintegrin essential for normal growth, fertility, and organ morphology and function. J Clin Invest 105, 1345– 1352.Leduc R & Apte SS. (2003) Characterization of ADAMTS-9 and ADAMTS-20 as a distinct ADAMTS subfamily related to Caenorhabditis elegans GON-1. J Biol Chem 278, 9503– 9513.Jungers KA & Apte SS. (2004) Discovery and characterization of a novel, widely expressed metalloprotease, ADAMTS10, and its proteolytic activation. J Biol Chem 279, 51208– 51217. etal. (2005) ADAMTS5 is the major aggrecanase in mouse cartilage in vivo and in vitro. Nature 434, 648– 652.El Hamidieh A & Patsavoudi E. (2010) Monoclonal antibody 4C5 prevents activation of MMP2 and MMP9 by disrupting their interaction with extracellular HSP90 and inhibits formation of metastatic breast cancer cell deposits. BMC Cell Biol 11, 51. Tang BL. (2001) ADAMTS: a novel family of extracellular matrix proteases. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 33, 33– 44.Berger T & Gerton GL. (2007) New insights into sperm-zona pellucida interaction: involvement of sperm lipid rafts. Front Biosci 12, 1748– 1766. Thaler CD & Cardullo RA. (1996) The initial molecular interaction between mouse sperm and the zona pellucida is a complex binding event. J Biol Chem 271, 23289– 23297. Thaler CD & Cardullo RA. (2002) Distinct membrane fractions from mouse sperm bind different zona pellucida glycoproteins. Biol Reprod 66, 65– 69.Dacheux JL & Gatti JL. (2006) Analysis of furin ectodomain shedding in epididymal fluid of mammals: demonstration that shedding of furin occurs in vivo. Reproduction 132, 899– 908.Murakami K & Nakayama K. (1993) Localization of Kex2-like processing endoproteases, furin and PC4, within mouse testis by in situ hybridization. FEBS Lett 316, 12– 16. etal. (1999) Purification and cloning of aggrecanase-1: a member of the ADAMTS family of proteins. Science 284, 1664– 1666.Staehelin T & Gordon J. (1979) Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76, 4350– 4354. Tulsiani DR & Abou-Haila A. (2004) Is sperm capacitation analogous to early phases of Ca2+-triggered membrane fusion in somatic cells and viruses? Bioassays 26, 281– 290.Lombardo M & Iruela-Arispe ML. (1999) METH-1, a human ortholog of ADAMTS-1, and METH-2 are members of a new family of proteins with angio-inhibitory activity. J Biol Chem 274, 23349– 23357.Myles DG & White JM. (1995) ADAM, a novel family of membrane proteins containing A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease domain: multipotential functions in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. J Cell Biol 131, 275– 278.Sadler JE & Fujikawa K. (2001) Structure of von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease (ADAMTS13), a metalloprotease involved in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. J Biol Chem 276, 41059– 41063. The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties. Please check your email for instructions on resetting your password. If you do not receive an email within 10 minutes, your email address may not be registered, and you may need to create a new Wiley Online Library account. Can\'t sign in? Forgot your username? Enter your email address below and we will send you your username If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username